找回密码
 立即注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

查看: 1529|回复: 21

12/18/09 XJ新闻: 2 Cheater + 1 invalid demo

  [复制链接]

该用户从未签到

发表于 2009-12-18 12:55:41 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
本帖最后由 fantasist 于 2009-12-18 13:33 编辑

Hey there,
大家好,

old story that happens to repeat itself on and on. You know the thrill already... Some people made an egoistical attempt to get their name on the record list (and some fame?) even though theydon't deserve it (because obviously they are missing the skills to get it in a legit way), by submitting cheated demos again. Come on guys, how can you be proud of it at all, if you know that the "record" was made with unfair methods?
历史不断重演着,你们应该已经有所了解。一些人自以为是地尝试着让他们的名字出现在WR列表中(还要些知名度?)即使他们并没有相应的能力(显然他们没有足够的技术去合法地达到目标),提交了作弊的demo。愚蠢的弟弟啊,如果“纪录”是用不公平的方法创造出的,还为它自豪什么呢?

Two cheat demos were submitted for the recent release, one was held back for further checks and another one was released accidently. Sorry for our mistake, it should'nt have be released at all, since it's pretty obvious what's going on - even without doing an advanced analysis. However, eDark did confirm that a slowmotion hack was used in both demos. And yes RQ,we can detect it, even if you use it for some of the jumps only.
最近提交的demo里有两个是作弊的,一个留着等待继续检查而另一个被不小心发布了。为我们的失误向大家道歉,它完全不该被发布,因为作弊痕迹很明显——根本不需要做进一步的分析。eDark确认这两个demo都使用了slowmotion。另外是的RQ,我们能检测出来,即使你只用slowmo完成一部分跳跃。

Here are the lucky "winner"s:
我们的“幸运儿”在这里:

Cheatdemos:

kz_fairy_island[+secret]_taff_0010 submitted by taff
kz_man_neighbourhood_RQ_0215 submitted by RQ

Furthermore there was another demo submitted, sn_beachcliff_bisqo_0506, which had invalid settings on it: It had fps_max  on "100" but vysnc enabled - and a windows refresh rate of 85hz, causing the same effect as if fps_max "85" was being used. Since we don't know if this was a misunderstanding, or an attempt to cheat, this won't be punished. Nevertheless the demo had to be rejected and the rules might have to be adjusted regarding that point.
另一个demo,sn_beachcliff_bisqo_0506,含有非法设置:fps_max是100,但没关垂直同步而且windows的刷新速度是85Hz,效果跟设置了"fps_max 85"一样。因为我们不知道这是误解还是作弊,所以这次就不处罚了。不过我们仍然要拒绝这个demo,并且会给规则加上更细致的说明。

评分

参与人数 1金币 +9 +9 收起 理由
takemea + 9 + 9 翻译,翻译……

查看全部评分

该用户从未签到

发表于 2009-12-18 12:56:52 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 sex 于 2009-12-18 12:58 编辑

等着 翻译。          2个作弊  

该用户从未签到

发表于 2009-12-18 13:07:16 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 FeNg_zi.Always 于 2009-12-18 13:44 编辑

大家好:

老掉牙的故事一次又一次上演,你们已经体会过了这样的感觉...有的人自私地试图让他们的名字出现在WR名单上(和一些声誉?),即使他们并不应得(因为显然他们正在丧失通过正规渠道来获得它的技术),再次提交了两个作弊Demo。来吧伙计,如果你知道这些记录都是不公正的,你怎么能以它为荣?

两个作弊Demo被上传发表,一个被阻止了,另一个无意中放出了。我们为我们的失误感到抱歉,它根本不应该被放出来,因为很明显是这么回事——即使不用先进的手段来分析。然而eDark确认两个Demo中都是用了slowmotion作弊。是的RQ,我们能检测到它,即使你只是在一部分跳跃中使用了它。

这里是幸运的“赢家”:

作弊Demo:
kz_fairy_island[+secret]_taff_0010 submitted by taff
kz_man_neighbourhood_RQ_0215 submitted by RQ

此外,还有一个上传的Demo,sn_beachcliff_bisqo_0506,但它使用了无效设置:fps_max "100" ,但是垂直同步没关——窗口刷新率85HZ,导致了fps_max "85"同时被使用。因为我们不知道这样做是误解还是作弊,不会处罚,不过Demo仍然会被拒绝,规则也不得不作出调整。

该用户从未签到

发表于 2009-12-18 13:18:24 | 显示全部楼层
又有2个作弊的...

该用户从未签到

发表于 2009-12-18 13:23:19 | 显示全部楼层
等着翻译看

该用户从未签到

发表于 2009-12-18 13:25:27 | 显示全部楼层
不懂英语的人路过!

该用户从未签到

发表于 2009-12-18 13:27:23 | 显示全部楼层
只知道cheater是作弊的意思的飘过...

该用户从未签到

发表于 2009-12-18 13:30:34 | 显示全部楼层
cheater是作弊者   我看到一个 FPS 85

该用户从未签到

发表于 2009-12-18 14:02:35 | 显示全部楼层
看翻译比看原文简单多了。呵呵,辛苦2位翻译者。

该用户从未签到

发表于 2009-12-18 14:07:44 | 显示全部楼层
愚蠢的弟弟啊.......
我想懂英语的都来试试翻译这段,不长嘛,大家看看有什么不同,再讨论
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表