- 听众
- 收听
- 积分
- 6534
- 主题
- 回帖
- 0
- 精华
注册时间2008-1-10
最后登录1970-1-1
该用户从未签到
|
本帖最后由 fantasist 于 2009-12-18 13:33 编辑
Hey there,
大家好,
old story that happens to repeat itself on and on. You know the thrill already... Some people made an egoistical attempt to get their name on the record list (and some fame?) even though theydon't deserve it (because obviously they are missing the skills to get it in a legit way), by submitting cheated demos again. Come on guys, how can you be proud of it at all, if you know that the "record" was made with unfair methods?
历史不断重演着,你们应该已经有所了解。一些人自以为是地尝试着让他们的名字出现在WR列表中(还要些知名度?)即使他们并没有相应的能力(显然他们没有足够的技术去合法地达到目标),提交了作弊的demo。愚蠢的弟弟啊,如果“纪录”是用不公平的方法创造出的,还为它自豪什么呢?
Two cheat demos were submitted for the recent release, one was held back for further checks and another one was released accidently. Sorry for our mistake, it should'nt have be released at all, since it's pretty obvious what's going on - even without doing an advanced analysis. However, eDark did confirm that a slowmotion hack was used in both demos. And yes RQ,we can detect it, even if you use it for some of the jumps only.
最近提交的demo里有两个是作弊的,一个留着等待继续检查而另一个被不小心发布了。为我们的失误向大家道歉,它完全不该被发布,因为作弊痕迹很明显——根本不需要做进一步的分析。eDark确认这两个demo都使用了slowmotion。另外是的RQ,我们能检测出来,即使你只用slowmo完成一部分跳跃。
Here are the lucky "winner"s:
我们的“幸运儿”在这里:
Cheatdemos:
kz_fairy_island[+secret]_taff_0010 submitted by taff
kz_man_neighbourhood_RQ_0215 submitted by RQ
Furthermore there was another demo submitted, sn_beachcliff_bisqo_0506, which had invalid settings on it: It had fps_max on "100" but vysnc enabled - and a windows refresh rate of 85hz, causing the same effect as if fps_max "85" was being used. Since we don't know if this was a misunderstanding, or an attempt to cheat, this won't be punished. Nevertheless the demo had to be rejected and the rules might have to be adjusted regarding that point.
另一个demo,sn_beachcliff_bisqo_0506,含有非法设置:fps_max是100,但没关垂直同步而且windows的刷新速度是85Hz,效果跟设置了"fps_max 85"一样。因为我们不知道这是误解还是作弊,所以这次就不处罚了。不过我们仍然要拒绝这个demo,并且会给规则加上更细致的说明。 |
评分
-
查看全部评分
|